Appointment of guards at Durgapur Project violating rule

Durgapur Project Admin Building

Appointment of guards at Durgapur Projects Ltd from a Trinamool supporter’s private agency has drawn controversy and said to have violated rule. Durgapur Project Limited (DPL) is primarily a power utility organization under the administrative control of the Department of Power and Non-conventional Energy Sources, Government of West Bengal.

Durgapur Project Limited

DPL management had hired guards from Clifford Facility Services Private Ltd and Awadh Security Services Private Ltd for the plant and its township area. These guards were trained ex-servicemen as only ex-servicemen should be recruited for the job. A senior power department official in Calcutta also confirmed that only ex-servicemen can be employed as security guards in state-owned power plants.
But the management also engaged Sumana Enterprise for 42 days, the letter to the DPL’s adviser and deputy general manager said. The guards hired by DPL from Sumana Enterprise were unskilled labourers, which was mentioned in the letter. “The management engaged M/s Sumana Enterprise as a stop gap arrangement for 42 days… to overcome the problem of engagement of hired security personnel,” the letter said.
CITU leadership of Durgapur has cited a letter from the office of the accountant-general (economic and revenue sector audit) that had in January said the appointments were “not at all justified”. According to CITU leaders in DPL, altogether 60 unskilled labourers were engaged as guards by the power utility and coke plant through Sumana Enterprise in September last year. The leaders pointed out that the decision violated an order issued by the management in 1995 that said only ex-servicemen could be employed for the posts.
A Citu leader of DPL has alleged that Sumana Enterprise was owned by the wife of Shibesh Pandit, said to be close to Debdas Majumdar, the general secretary of the INTTUC-led union at DPL.
Mriganka Majumdar, the managing director of DPL, initially refused comment, saying it was an “internal matter”. However, when asked about the allegation, Majumdar said: “The allegations by Citu are baseless. It was Citu that indulged in such favouritism at DPL during Left rule. Everything is done fairly now,” he said.
Sources said the allegations by the CPM’s labour wing, CITU were prompted by the sacking of 90 of its supporters as guards in 2011.
Pankaj Roy Sarkar, the Citu’s convener in Durgapur, said: “The DPL management had earlier sacked 90 guards who were Citu supporters. This happened after Trinamul came to power in 2011. The management had said that the 90 were not ex-servicemen. But they had in September engaged unskilled labourers as guards from an agency whose owner is a Trinamul supporter. The DPL’s board resolution says nobody other than an ex-serviceman could be engaged as a guard.”
The letter from the accountant-general’s office also questioned the payment of salaries to the 60 guards. “The company made the payment of unskilled casual labourers from budget code 94610009 (engagement of gunman from private security agencies), although they were not gunmen. The reason for diversion of fund may please be stated to audit.”

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.